Re:Mining Bitcoin with pencil and paper: 0.67 hashes per day...
by ajmurmann on Monday February 15, 2021 @04:20PM
(#26147578)
The real solution here is not complaining about individual use cases of energy, but effective carbon pricing. Wit cap & trade on a global level, this wouldn't be an issue. Of course there seems no political will nor ability to make this happen any time soon.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mining Bitcoin with pencil and paper: 0.67 hashes per day...
by vinger on Monday February 15, 2021 @05:35PM
(#26148476)
The big miners in China and Iceland are using hydro and geothermal. Pricing the other miners out might have some interesting side effects.
Re:Mining Bitcoin with pencil and paper: 0.67 hashes per day...
by exyi on Monday February 15, 2021 @06:03PM
(#26148793)
China is relying heavily on coal power (AFAIK, can't find reliable source quickly). Iceland has clean energy, but in contrary to the popular wisdom "only" ~30% is geothermal, most is hydro. See https://www.electricitymap.org/zone/IS for more detail.
Re:Mining Bitcoin with pencil and paper: 0.67 hashes per day...
by hulahoof on Monday February 15, 2021 @07:15PM
(#26149479)
They are taking about the miners, not the grid as a whole. There are some massive operation utilising hydro setups in the middle of nowhere that were otherwise unused
Re:Mining Bitcoin with pencil and paper: 0.67 hashes per day...
by kevingadd on Monday February 15, 2021 @05:01PM
(#26148075)
In some cases miners literally steal electricity or other resources to mine, so carbon pricing won't affect scenarios like that [1]. Maybe we can treat those as a rounding error... At the point where miners are willing to do things like build a transformer station you're in wild territory way beyond a neighbor tapping into your cable line for free TV. If the money's good, what's stopping a connected miner from bribing the right people to get a discount on electricity and skip the carbon tax?
[1] https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/russian...