News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?. Parent comment

Re:Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0? by baldfat on Sunday February 14, 2021 @11:31AM (#26133679)
I don't like working with DATA TABLES UNLESS it is a HUGE data frames. Then if it is huge I'll go towards sparks. I normally am working with under a million objects which with today's computers is not that big.

Edit I meant to say that DATA TABLES library in R reminds me more of Query.jl then tiddyverse

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0? by wodenokoto on Sunday February 14, 2021 @12:08PM (#26133991)
What are you doing in the tidyverse that is not related to dataframes (or tibbles as the subclass of data.frame, that tidyverse uses is called)?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0? by phillc73 on Sunday February 14, 2021 @01:09PM (#26134570)
Query.jl supports two different paradigms, one inspired directly by LINQ, the other by dplyr.[1] I actually prefer data.table in R, over dplyr, and Query.jl is really quite different.

[1] http://www.queryverse.org/Query.jl/stable/

[ Parent | on HN ]