Statement on New York Times Article

Re:Statement on New York Times Article by bpodgursky on Sunday February 14, 2021 @12:06AM (#26129855)

The WSJ produces just as much good content, and you can subscribe there without inadvertently funding rag hit pieces like this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on New York Times Article by mrgordon on Sunday February 14, 2021 @12:31AM (#26129950)

The WSJ has a ton of dubious articles. The Opinion pieces are garbage compared to the average one in the Times although of course both have misses

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on New York Times Article by ardy42 on Sunday February 14, 2021 @12:53AM (#26130039)

> The WSJ has a ton of dubious articles. The Opinion pieces are garbage compared to the average one in the Times although of course both have misses

I agree with you on that. I subscribed to both for awhile, but dropped the WSJ because it had less international content, its articles tended to lack background (great if you're following a story closely, not so great if you haven't), and its opinion section was utterly boring and predictable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on New York Times Article by bpodgursky on Sunday February 14, 2021 @12:41AM (#26129994)

The opinion pieces are contained to the opinion section though. (One) problem with the NYTimes is that that is no longer true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on New York Times Article by colinmhayes on Sunday February 14, 2021 @02:02AM (#26130288)

If you don't think the journal has rag hit pieces I don't know what to say other than you obviously haven't read many articles or practically any opinion pieces from them.

[ Parent | on HN ]