News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WHO scientists: NYT misquoted us to fit a prescribed narr... by shanhaiguan on Saturday February 13, 2021 @06:49PM (#26128208)
Words have meanings.
Re:WHO scientists: NYT misquoted us to fit a prescribed narr... by 4eor0 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @08:48PM (#26128937)
But meanings vary depending on region, education, political background.

Science, direct experience, is about as concrete as it gets.

Re:WHO scientists: NYT misquoted us to fit a prescribed narr... by the_only_law on Saturday February 13, 2021 @07:04PM (#26128328)
Not any more apparently. Fascist, socialist, communist, alt-right, neoliberal, etc. just mean whatever they need to quickly slur someone with them. Hell ever Marxism seems like it doesn’t actually refer to anything Marx or his contemporaries ever said anymore. Did you know Bloomberg is a Maoist?

Fascinating how the site obsessed with their pseudo-intellectual superiority can’t add anything other than downvotes.

Re:WHO scientists: NYT misquoted us to fit a prescribed narr... by robin21 on Sunday February 14, 2021 @08:30PM (#26138052)
Imagine a discussion board where you could not use any -ism.
Re:WHO scientists: NYT misquoted us to fit a prescribed narr... by whythre on Saturday February 13, 2021 @07:49PM (#26128595)
I agree. Unless we are talking about avowed actual Nazis or card-carrying Communists, much of this extremist labeling can be reduced to identify ‘enemy tribe members.’