Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by ohgodplsno on Saturday February 13, 2021 @10:08AM
(#26123988)
I am extremely surprised at what the other poster is saying. I've had 400+ tabs running and my highest memory usage is 5GB. Some things like Slack will of course be horrible, but it's the same as Chrome.
Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by h0p3 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @12:06PM
(#26124792)
Hey, I'm surprised too! I also think it's fair to say I'm a hardcore addict (https://philosopher.life/#Link%20Log). I dreamt of mainlining T1 lines as a kid, and it's never stopped. ( ՞ਊ ՞). My eGF says I'm a link dragon, but I'm really just an oldfag schizo neckbeard basement-dweller (https://philosopher.life/#2020.06.22%20-%20MJos%3A%20The%20M...) searching for the meaning of life on his plebstation (https://philosopher.life/#Monster-%CE%A6). It's a pleasure to meet you, nomad (https://philosopher.life/#Find%20The%20Others). Life is full of delightful surprises.
Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by h0p3 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @12:22AM
(#26121620)
It's not. I'm sorry. I'm regularly dumping 30GB into FF. There's nowhere else to go though. =/.
Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by bscphil on Saturday February 13, 2021 @06:59AM
(#26123125)
The frustrating thing about modern browsers is that none of them try to be good desktop citizens, for the lack of a better term. If you have 8 or 16 or 32 or 64 GB of memory, and you open enough tabs, your browser will eventually consume all of it, even though most browsers are perfectly capable of suspending unused tabs when they're under memory pressure. They simply don't register a problem until your memory is nearly gone.
If you have swap space, it's even worse, because there's not noticeable memory pressure until you've always consumed a good bit of your swap. So I frequently find myself in a situation where I start compiling something or launch a game, and have my computer immediately slow to a crawl. Check htop, and it's always the browser I have open, taking ~13 GB of memory and another 4 GB of swap. It's certainly true that "unused RAM is wasted RAM", but that only holds when you can reclaim low priority RAM when you need to launch something new. Browsers are really bad at doing that, so they sit rather uncomfortably next to the other programs on your desktop.
Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by h0p3 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @02:41PM
(#26126102)
Bingo. You got it. `/salute`. Given sandboxing security features, it's too easy to balloon up too. I periodically have to restart the application (which incurs some costs on this external cognition process, unfortunately). Browsers aren't built for people like me (and the way standards maliciously churn qua Google doesn't inspire confidence in finding a long-term, meaningful solution), and I appreciate that it's seemingly a lot to ask. Btw, my name is h0p3. It's a pleasure to meet you. Thank you for your charitable response.
I know it is off topic. However, can anyone share info if Firefox is better at this point considering memory usage?