Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by h0p3 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @02:41PM
(#26126102)
Bingo. You got it. `/salute`. Given sandboxing security features, it's too easy to balloon up too. I periodically have to restart the application (which incurs some costs on this external cognition process, unfortunately). Browsers aren't built for people like me (and the way standards maliciously churn qua Google doesn't inspire confidence in finding a long-term, meaningful solution), and I appreciate that it's seemingly a lot to ask. Btw, my name is h0p3. It's a pleasure to meet you. Thank you for your charitable response.
If you have swap space, it's even worse, because there's not noticeable memory pressure until you've always consumed a good bit of your swap. So I frequently find myself in a situation where I start compiling something or launch a game, and have my computer immediately slow to a crawl. Check htop, and it's always the browser I have open, taking ~13 GB of memory and another 4 GB of swap. It's certainly true that "unused RAM is wasted RAM", but that only holds when you can reclaim low priority RAM when you need to launch something new. Browsers are really bad at doing that, so they sit rather uncomfortably next to the other programs on your desktop.