Re:The Miyawaki Method: A Better Way to Build Forests? (2019)
by reportingsjr on Friday February 12, 2021 @04:39PM
(#26118874)
Yes, this is something larger groups are starting to realize and try to work with. Look up the Nature Conservancy's climate change corridors.
They are trying to preserve/conserve land in strips as a priority. This way as climate changes, plants and animals will have a path to migrate unimpeded (or at least impeded less than if there were large roads/developments in the way!).
Re:The Miyawaki Method: A Better Way to Build Forests? (2019)
by 786caeefb13016 on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:52PM
(#26117813)
"Assisted migration" provides ongoing ethical dilemmas, but things seem to be moving in that direction. See, for example, https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/hubs/northern-forests/topic...
So I think the current consensus is something like: help forests migrate faster than their natural rate, but don't wormhole species across the planet.
Re:The Miyawaki Method: A Better Way to Build Forests? (2019)
by abraae on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:10PM
(#26117320)
That's a fascinating question. We hear a lot of talk about planting forests to combat climate change.
But it seems very feasible that just planting whatever is thriving today will backfire in 20 years time when that species becomes unviable due to temperature rise, reduced rainfall or arrival of some exotic bio pest.
When you plant a new forest today, do you try to preserve the native species or do you anticipate what species will thrive in the area 20-50 years from now?