Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by marcell on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:28PM
(#26116800)
Worth noting this policy is contrary to the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause, and also a California law prohibiting discrimination based on race that was recently upheld by a large majority vote.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by fallingknife on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:37PM
(#26116898)
Amazing that in 2021 we only enforce the racial discrimination laws in one direction. That's also what they did in 1921.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by vmception on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:38PM
(#26116909)
There is no data to support that, a racial discrimination law should be levied here, because now the action just occurred.
edit: so 20 year old data is being masqueraded as modern civil rights realities. never seen that before in any other topic.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by fallingknife on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:50PM
(#26117037)
No data? There are supreme court decisions on this:
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by vmception on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:57PM
(#26117136)
In 2003 a racial discrimination law favored one group, your premise was about 2021. In the last 18 years (oh wow people born then can vote now!) race-based discrimination statutes are routinely enforced for all groups, including in favor of the majority group when they have been discriminated against by race by a potential or current employer.
Take a quick browse at the EOCC enforcement actions, or California's DFEH, and other agencies and other court cases.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by vmception on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:00PM
(#26117176)
a racial discrimination law should be levied here, because now the action just occurred.
the laws are not pre-emptive.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by bluefirebrand on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:01PM
(#26117192)
Should be, but we know it won't.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by vmception on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:37PM
(#26116901)
That's why they should have said culture fit
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by underseacables on Friday February 12, 2021 @03:21PM
(#26118118)
Culture fit is code for specific gender/race/socioeconomic level. When a job tells you that you’re not a good culture fit for the company, it means they just don’t like you enough to want to hire you, even though your qualifications could be exceeding what they need.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by pbourke on Friday February 12, 2021 @08:48PM
(#26120727)
> Culture fit is code for specific gender/race/socioeconomic level.
And age
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by vmception on Friday February 12, 2021 @03:58PM
(#26118471)
yes, that's the joke. it also wouldn't make the local news.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by newurs2019 on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:26PM
(#26117517)
It seems to me a lot of companies are violating that policy, notably in tech in CA. How hasn't there been a major lawsuit? This has been going on for years and is getting progressively worse.
Re:San Francisco school board halts appointment based on race
by marcell on Friday February 12, 2021 @05:24PM
(#26119224)
The laws I mentioned (14th amendment and California Prop 209) only apply to the Federal government and California.
There are other laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and those may be applied to tech companies in some situations. That law was recently used to sue Harvard for discriminating against Asians in their admissions process.