Flexible working shows 55% high performers compared to 36% for 40 hours/week

Re:Flexible working shows 55% high performers compared to 36... by sokoloff on Friday February 12, 2021 @11:26AM (#26115338)

There are almost certainly 0.0x to 0.1x programmers. What percentage of the people working as programmers are in that realm is subject to some debate, but I've absolutely worked with programmers whom I would put into the "obviously 10x more value-creating than the median" camp.

(Some, but not all, were also abrasive personalities who didn't work well in teams.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flexible working shows 55% high performers compared to 36... by isbvhodnvemrwvn on Friday February 12, 2021 @12:39PM (#26116242)

There's also -1.0x programmers - those who make others leave or are just an overall burden on others

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flexible working shows 55% high performers compared to 36... by Ekaros on Friday February 12, 2021 @03:53PM (#26118423)

I wonder if there is cap minus side... Maybe not local side, but on global...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flexible working shows 55% high performers compared to 36... by aero- on Friday February 12, 2021 @11:34AM (#26115415)

Have any referrals? looking for a cto

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Flexible working shows 55% high performers compared to 36... by sokoloff on Friday February 12, 2021 @11:45AM (#26115537)

My email is in my profile. I'm happy to make those referrals, but will note that most of them have landed in places that make them appropriately comfortable and engaged, so they're hard to dislodge (don't think I haven't tried every so often).

[ Parent | on HN ]