News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Computer Networks: A Systems Approach by beaconstudios on Friday February 12, 2021 @11:02AM (#26115066)
I'm confused. What makes this a "systems approach"? I've scanned through the index and a few chapters but it doesn't appear to be applying a systems/cybernetic approach to network engineering, unless I've missed something. Is it because it covers the whole stack in a systematic way?

Not bagging on the book, by the way - just trying to establish whether it's worth reading through, as I'm already somewhat familiar with network protocols but would be interested in systems/cybernetics insights into networking.

Re:Computer Networks: A Systems Approach by MikeBVaughn on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:54PM (#26117835)
We used the book in my undergrad networking course, and I liked it quite a bit. It's "systems" in the catchall "lower-ish-level computing" sense of "systems-level programming," rather than the "systems theory" sense.

The pedagogical structure of the book makes it a solid follow-up to a standard undergrad OS class, IIRC. It's been ten years since I've read it, though, so YMMV.

Re:Computer Networks: A Systems Approach by halfeatenpie on Friday February 12, 2021 @01:51PM (#26117053)
I agree with this comment. I don't understand what specifically makes this a "system approach".
Re:Computer Networks: A Systems Approach by stjohnswarts on Friday February 12, 2021 @05:55PM (#26119519)
It takes a bottom up approach rather than top-down, and gives you all the gory details as opposed to bird's eye view of things. I would take it as that. System is an almost useless word other than implying a "lower level" view.
Re:Computer Networks: A Systems Approach by beaconstudios on Friday February 12, 2021 @07:21PM (#26120238)
"system" actually has a ton of meaning, it's just been co-opted to mean "hardware" in software circles. It means a collective object that is greater than the sum of its parts.
Re:Computer Networks: A Systems Approach by trepetti on Friday February 12, 2021 @02:57PM (#26117876)
Maybe as opposed to a theoretical treatment? In academia, there is a dichotomy in CS research between systems and theory, which may have been what they were getting at.