News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Podman: A Daemonless Container Engine by tpush on Thursday February 11, 2021 @04:26PM (#26107503)
> Excellent question, especially since the code is copy-pasted without crediting the original authors.

That seems like a serious allegation. Can you back that up?

Re:Podman: A Daemonless Container Engine by zapita on Thursday February 11, 2021 @04:41PM (#26107701)
It’s right there in the repo history. Start from the first commits. I don’t know how serious of an allegation it is: copy-pasting open-source code without crediting it properly is rude, but not illegal.
Re:Podman: A Daemonless Container Engine by notriddle on Thursday February 11, 2021 @11:33PM (#26110766)
No, that’s totally illegal. The Docker Engine is licensed under the Apache-2.0 terms, which require attribution.
Re:Podman: A Daemonless Container Engine by SEJeff on Friday February 12, 2021 @10:26AM (#26114634)
It is actually against copyright law, and redhat legal would take any allegations very seriously. What in specific do you think is copy and pasted code?
Re:Podman: A Daemonless Container Engine by hda111 on Sunday February 14, 2021 @06:15AM (#26131363)
Docker is properly attributed to, see https://github.com/containers/storage/blob/a4cc7aa79e050c976...

I think OP wanted to say that Podman hates Docker what is not I feel when I'm interacting with the community there. People who use Podman do it because of it's additional features that Docker does not have, like starting an Container from a rootfs or mounting the currect directory in a container using "." as path. Also building containers using a shellscript is supported. No need to learn the Dockerfile syntax. There are lot of small things that make Podman better integrated into Linux systems: running the container via systemd is a lot more intuitive.