News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by darwinwhy on Thursday February 11, 2021 @12:46AM (#26098636)
What is Passenger exactly? Never heard of it before now. A quick Google brings up a marketing page that doesn't explain much more.
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by ForHackernews on Thursday February 11, 2021 @03:49AM (#26099556)
It's an application server. If you're familiar with the Python webdev ecosystem, Passenger is roughly a Ruby equivalent for something like uWSGI or Gunicorn. (IIRC, you can actually run Python apps with Passenger now, too)
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by coldtea on Thursday February 11, 2021 @05:34AM (#26100091)
Where now = for 5 years or more.
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by universa1 on Thursday February 11, 2021 @03:08AM (#26099334)
Something like mod_perl / mod_xxx in the early days... and they did some work on the concurrency problems with rails and ruby around the ruby 1.8 days iirc... In the meantime they expanded to more languages...
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by e12e on Thursday February 11, 2021 @08:55AM (#26101510)
Not sure if you mean this page or not: https://www.phusionpassenger.com/ But as they say, it's an application server. Similar to mod_perl for apache/php, unicorn or indeed nodejs (which can function as an application server for Javascript).
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by johnmcauley on Thursday February 11, 2021 @01:18AM (#26098791)
It’s a Ruby web server that can we bed used with nginx or Apache.