News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Interview Frustrations by ng12 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @04:46PM (#26095250)
Unfortunately rejecting candidates and/or providing feedback can be a legal minefield. The most generic excuse is the best one and using objective facts is one of the safest ways to reject someone.
Re:Interview Frustrations by dghlsakjg on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:17PM (#26095555)
I see liability cited as a reason all the time, but I never hear about specific cases or settlements, or even a justification from an actual legal team (HR doesn't count, they are trained to never allow anything as far as I can tell). It comes across from the inside and the outside as pure laziness.
Re:Interview Frustrations by throwaway2245 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:46PM (#26095853)
It's a legal minefield in the sense that there is legal trouble if a hiring manager says "I hired the other candidate because they were white", but there is no such trouble if they just privately think it.
Re:Interview Frustrations by collyw on Thursday February 11, 2021 @09:10AM (#26101645)
Would there be anything wrong with "we really liked you but found someone else better"? That's been the situation in my company recently. None of the candidates were bad, all of them would have been capable of doing the job but we had to choose one.
Re:Interview Frustrations by tidepod12 on Thursday February 11, 2021 @10:48AM (#26102825)
That's what they said. From the article: "They said that I interviewed extremely well, but that they decided to go with another candidate."