News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by arithmomachist on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @12:50PM (#26092431)
At the very least the proof of work ought to compute something useful.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by root_axis on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @01:36PM (#26093044)
It can't be made useful because the output of a useful calculation can't be known in advance - otherwise it wouldn't be useful.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by freebreakfast on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @03:05PM (#26093963)
I think Gridcoin offers a happy medium. It's proof of stake, but it also offers rewards for participating in BOINC-based research projects.

https://gridcoin.us/

Not exactly "proof of work" in the same sense its being used, but I wish that the project would get more attention.

Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by Forbo on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @06:04PM (#26096069)
I've been trying to get people to pay attention to this project for years. I think a lot of the "useful computation" chains are much more likely to survive the next cryptocurrency crash because of their inherent utility. For example, the various storage coins, stuff like Nym or Oxen, Namecoin, etc.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by minsc__and__boo on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @02:35PM (#26093623)
You can gain use computing to gain specificity from complexity though, and recognize that new specificity - i.e. brute force protein folding calculations.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by lxgr on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @01:29PM (#26092953)
That would be great, but unfortunately the structure of problems that are well suited to proof of work (hard to compute but easy to verify in a decentralized way) doesn't seem to have too many practical applications.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by arithmomachist on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @03:27PM (#26094280)
Aren't there lots of NP problems that have this property?
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by lxgr on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:05PM (#26095430)
Yes, but how many of them are distributable in the way required by the constraints of mining? (I really hope I'm wrong and would love to see a counterexample of "constructive" mining!)
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by kqr on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @04:09PM (#26094836)
All of them, by definition.