Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by mdoms on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @12:31PM
(#26092169)
On the other hand Visa actually works for its intended purpose.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by Gibbon1 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @04:44PM
(#26095227)
And Bitcoin is a paper asset backed by absolutely nothing.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by arcticbull on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:48PM
(#26096867)
Ah see this is where you're wrong. The tokens are proof that huge quantities of energy were wasted. It's a proof of waste algorithm.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by splintercell on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @04:47PM
(#26095257)
Bitcoin is a global settlement layer. it is not a representation of something else, it's the final product on its own.
You're not going to say that in a prison system cigarettes are not backed by anything for them to be used as a currency.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by Gibbon1 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:10PM
(#26095476)
I take my comment back. Bitcoin is backed by 'the market can stay delusional longer than you can stay solvent'
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by midasuni on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:49PM
(#26095889)
You can say that about any currency. An 80 year old billionaire still needs someone to care for him, just like an 80 year old pauper. He relies on the hope that his dollars will be accepted, to look after his medical and care needs as well as security and ownership needs.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by forty on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @06:41PM
(#26096371)
My understanding is that because people have mortgages in dollar (or other useful money), you can be pretty confident that many people are going to be motivated enough to get some dollar (they have to pay their mortgage with it)
On the other hand, no one is going to be in a difficult situation if they cannot get bitcoin.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by splintercell on Thursday February 11, 2021 @04:19PM
(#26107375)
Well the whole idea of Bitcoin being a store of value isn't that its price is stable between 2017 and 2018, but its non-inflationary in long run (something which isn't true for the time being, it is inflationary.
However, the idea is that between 1971 (the closing of the gold window), and now, USD and all fiat currencies lost 99% of their value. The same is not true for Bitcoin on a similar time frame (i.e. 30+ years).
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by AshWolfy on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @08:13PM
(#26097039)
The US government is functionally bound to the dollar, and its size is enough to guarantee the continued functioning of the dollar. On the other hand bitcoin is backed by speculators and criminals, hardly a stable foundation for a currency or commodity.