Re:Pseudophilosophy encourages confused, self-indulgent thin...
by dragonwriter on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @11:26AM
(#26091211)
> Well that's the problem with all proofs
No, its the problem with pure logical proofs, which is why for statements about reality rather than abstract relations of concepts, empirical proofs (despite being less absolute) are generally preferred.
> the ontological argument
Since you have merely waved at and sketched the argument, let me do the same it's demolition: existence is not a predicate.
No, its the problem with pure logical proofs, which is why for statements about reality rather than abstract relations of concepts, empirical proofs (despite being less absolute) are generally preferred.
> the ontological argument
Since you have merely waved at and sketched the argument, let me do the same it's demolition: existence is not a predicate.