Re:Man to pay £25,000 ($34,000) damages over negative TrustP...
by duxup on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @11:46AM
(#26079596)
Better Business Bureau too. It's been documented a number of times that when a non member joins suddenly poor ratings will rise / complaints vanish.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Man to pay £25,000 ($34,000) damages over negative TrustP...
by wsinks on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @03:22PM
(#26081993)
Interesting thing to note about the BBB is that it is a federation of independent businesses with loose national control. I understand that to the consumer they look the same, but this argument is a bit disingenuous to compare the BBB, a non-profit weak national entity, with these globally internet focused ratings businesses. Each BBB region has control over only their region.^1
The BBB you might be referencing about is the BBB of LA, which no longer exists and this 2015 article mentions: https://money.cnn.com/2015/09/30/news/better-business-bureau...
That BBB was then merged into the Silicon Valley BBB, a totally different set of people and operations.
Re:Man to pay £25,000 ($34,000) damages over negative TrustP...
by mywittyname on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @03:12PM
(#26081910)
The BBB perfected this model long before the internet was around. I worked at a computer repair shop way-back-when and the owner called the BBB an extortion racket.
Re:Man to pay £25,000 ($34,000) damages over negative TrustP...
by johng on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @07:13PM
(#26084310)
This. 100%. If you don’t pay the BBB their extortion fee they will tell anyone who asks that “you are not a member in good standing” which is technically true since you are not a member. Because you didn’t pay the fee. Legalized extortion.