Arguably the public analysis of the correctness of their methods ought to be done once in a fashion that is usable by all former and subsequent defendants. This is supported by their own claims that such an analysis will be extremely onerous.

If its a multi million dollar affair like they claim its virtually impossible that every defendant will be able to fund such an affair.

In fact in the case that a disastrous flaw is found it may be advantageous to simply drop the case and hope that past and future defendants wont be able to each afford to press the point.