Scrabulous shut down on Facebook

Re:Scrabulous shut down on Facebook by Locke on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @11:49AM (#260646)

While it's true that you can't copyright a game, you can copyright parts of a game. For example, the game's artwork or the official Scrabble dictionary. I haven't actually played Scrabulous, but if they used the exact same board layout, that might be copyright infringement. Or, if they used the official word list, that might be copyright infringement.

You can also copyright the text describing the rules of the game. But, I doubt they'd be so lazy as to copy that...

And, of course, you can trademark the name of a game. As you said, Scrabulous is probably too similar to Scrabble.

I think it's possible to legally make a Scrabble knock off (not a lawyer, though!)... but, if Scrabulous had used a non-derivative board, word list, and a completely different name would they have gotten so popular?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scrabulous shut down on Facebook by nickb on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @12:21PM (#260702)

You can't copyright a database of publicly available information (e.g. a dictionary, a phone book etc.): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications_v._Rural_Tel...

Some dictionaries have been inserting a fake word into their lists so that they can copyright that specific word and go after the infringer for using that word in their dictionaries. They can also copyright the definition of words. But you can't copyright Scrabble's list of acceptable words.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scrabulous shut down on Facebook by silentbicycle on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @12:37PM (#260732)

See also: "Fictitious entries" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry)

"Ghost words" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_word)

[ Parent | on HN ]