No I don't think so; a monk copying work is different from a developer creating original work.
I'll admit that trivial CRUD applications are boring, but with that kind of application it's about understanding and shaping the domain. Naming things, if you will. (disclaimer: I'm working on a CRUD app as we speak, thousands of fields in dozens of modules).
so the question was what makes software developers different?
also, what does original work mean? If you mean in the sense of PhD level research, I haven't worked in a lot of places where 'original work' was done. it is mostly glueing together other people's work (which is original to the person doing the glueing maybe).
A developer has to hold a cogent mental model of the problem they’re working on. Someone copying text might be able to do it while thinking of other things. If a developer is interrupted, their mental model “pops” like a bubble, and they might have to mentally start from scratch once they’ve dealt with the interruption.
I agree that context switching and interruption has a high cost, but isn't the cost pretty much the same regardless of your job?