That's a solution on the product level. It's not a solution on the systemic level, but that's not what I meant.

It's at the same level as "cut your intake 50%", but more effective.

No, some people are eating grass and then not eating meat. And I'm not talking about today specifically but in general. 100 calories of A replace 100 calories of B.

> It's going to cause the government to kill subsidies therefore jobs and not get their votes from bovine states?

If people don't buy meat, then meat isn't made, subsidies or not.

> Ignorant of their commercial interests and completely brainwashed by their cultural narrative.

Whose interests? I'm not sure what you think I'm missing.

> You know not everybody shares your dull sense of taste right? You know people can taste the difference and they have no plans of accepting the future you fantasize right?

But... you were suggesting people eat less meat and more vegetables!

Being able to tell the difference doesn't mean you can't swap one for the other.