Re:The war on disinformation is a war on dissent
by cudgy on Sunday February 07, 2021 @05:06AM
(#26053932)
So, if something is well-intentioned, it is ok to propagate falsehoods even if it degrades the trust in the institution you represent? Fauci’s (and others) actions have done huge damage to the ability of these institutions to convey information going forward and that effect will hurt the very healthcare workers he was supposedly trying to protect.
Re:The war on disinformation is a war on dissent
by simonh on Sunday February 07, 2021 @05:29AM
(#26054022)
No it’s not ok, and I very clearly said so. Personally, I think he should have offered his resignation and I regret not saying so in my previous comment, but that’s what I meant by a cost. It’s a shame, I think he’s probably the best candidate for the job, but there are other was he could contribute and wilful deception on material issues can’t be allowed to become acceptable. The risks to civil society are too great.
Re:The war on disinformation is a war on dissent
by cudgy on Sunday February 07, 2021 @07:02AM
(#26054466)
Yet you still think Fauci is the best for the job. Confusing.
Re:The war on disinformation is a war on dissent
by simonh on Sunday February 07, 2021 @05:29PM
(#26058828)
When part of someone’s job is advising the public, and they mislead the public when doing so, they should face consequences - even if they are otherwise the best person for the job.
In the current political climate lying and wilful deception have become normalised. That has to stop, as an urgent priority. Democracy relies on the electorate making informed decisions, and that system is compromised if they are being mislead and manipulated.
The fact is though, people are willing to accept being lied to by people they otherwise view favourably. For example a lot of the people decrying Fauci as a liar support Trump, who at the beginning of the pandemic was telling a journalist in private how the coronavirus was deadly and more dangerous than the worst flus, but in public at the same time was saying it was a hoax and nothing to worry about, and obstructing efforts to prepare for it.
People will choose the truths they care about. That’s why integrity in public life is so important. I don’t think it can be an absolute in practice, politicians, even scientists are only human. But there must be a cost to knowingly deceiving the public, and there must be contrition, it can never be considered an acceptable practice. It can never be good enough to just point to an ideological opponent and say, well, they do it too. That’s not an argument.