News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feynman's Integral Trick by bobbylarrybobby on Friday February 05, 2021 @05:48PM (#26042211)
Interesting. Reminds me of the “snake oil” technique useful when evaluating complex sums in combinatorics. By treating the sum in question as the coefficient of x^n in another sum, you can often obtain an expression where finding the coefficient of x^n — which is the value you’re after — is simple.
Re:Feynman's Integral Trick by selfishgene on Friday February 05, 2021 @05:45PM (#26042175)
There are some important mathematical subtleties that this article glosses over. More details can be found here:

http://fy.chalmers.se/~tfkhj/FeynmanIntegration.pdf

Re:Feynman's Integral Trick by alimw on Friday February 05, 2021 @04:26PM (#26041424)
I think this is the same trick I eventually (too late) found to make my model tractable assuming a bivariate Normal. It certainly hadn't been my first instinct to consider rate of change with respect to correlation.
Re:Feynman's Integral Trick by iuiujmfi787 on Friday February 05, 2021 @05:41PM (#26042143)
Highly relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/2117/
Re:Feynman's Integral Trick by oiosdifo on Friday February 05, 2021 @06:22PM (#26042480)
I wonder how many downvoters of this relevant XKCD reference actually read the article and understand that Feynman's Integral Trick involves differentiating under the integral sign. The relevant XKCD is about how much simpler it is to differentiate than to integrate (which can frequently be impossible using standard college calculus techniques).
Re:Feynman's Integral Trick by cweill on Friday February 05, 2021 @04:01PM (#26041137)
Great article! Given we are all working from home now, some of the advice here is helpful even when just a regular dev, as opposed to DevRel.