Re:Peter Naur's view of programming
by rorykoehler on Friday February 05, 2021 @05:33AM
(#26034876)
I’m an autodidact. No teacher can provide the density and velocity of information and knowledge the Internet, science papers and books can provide. I can’t watch a lecture at 2x speed if its live. I can’t cherry pick. I have to be at a certain place at a certain time when I might not be in the right headspace. Then add on top that’s it’s basically a crapshoot whether or not you get along with your teacher or not. I don’t regret going to college but I didn’t gain much academic knowledge there either.
Re:Peter Naur's view of programming
by jimmyvalmer on Friday February 05, 2021 @07:12AM
(#26035458)
100%. As an undergrad in the 90s I came to this conclusion as well. Then when YouTube, Khan Academy, and MOOCs hit critical mass in the 2010s, I could see the beginning of the end. COVID-19 has greatly accelerated the demise of in-person learning, and the fact that colleges continue to charge the same tuition is clear evidence that what they're selling isn't education, it's credentialling.
Re:Peter Naur's view of programming
by thomasahle on Friday February 05, 2021 @06:17AM
(#26035120)
> I can’t watch a lecture at 2x speed if its live. I can’t cherry pick.
If you have a 1:1 teacher you can just tell them what you already know and they can jump to the parts you don't. Much more efficient than skipping through a video for interesting snippets.
Re:Peter Naur's view of programming
by rorykoehler on Friday February 05, 2021 @06:29AM
(#26035196)
I think 1:1 or even one to many teaching is amazing but more for the cutting edge stuff. It’s changing how you think more than what you know.
While documentation has both advantages and disadvantages compared to in-person training, video tutorials are strictly worse than an interactive lecture.