Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by 93po on Thursday February 04, 2021 @02:36PM
(#26028928)
I tried contributing and there are so many entrenched "don't touch my stuff" senior editors or moderators that it's often hard to do much of anything depending on where you are. I gave up after spending 40+ hours attempting to help clean up little known articles of a genre of music only to have 90% of what I did get reversed even though I am very confident it was within wikipedia guidelines. I was also harassed and accused of racism (by the subject of the article) after nominating his article for deletion because it didn't meet notability requirements.
Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by h_anna_h on Thursday February 04, 2021 @02:19PM
(#26028763)
Sadly this is not what happened with Mozilla.
Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by mikepurvis on Thursday February 04, 2021 @02:27PM
(#26028834)
Isn't it? Mozilla has cut or spun-off basically everything other than Firefox.
Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by Macha on Friday February 05, 2021 @07:12AM
(#26035455)
The most prominent project on mozilla.org at time of writing is Mozilla VPN. Pocket also gets substantial screen space dedicated: https://www.mozilla.org/en-GB/
Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by mikepurvis on Friday February 05, 2021 @09:52AM
(#26036870)
Fair, though I would argue that those services are much more closely tied to the core experience of Firefox (and in particular the promise of safer, more private internet access) than something like Sunbird ever was.
Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by sudosysgen on Friday February 05, 2021 @12:37PM
(#26038885)
Pocket and Mozilla VPN are prominent because they drive revenue which is useful to limit dependency on Google, thus greatly helping Firefox.
Re:Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation
by kevin_thibedeau on Friday February 05, 2021 @10:59AM
(#26037681)
Pocket generates revenue for Mozilla.
I think that Wikipedia just doesn't need that much money. If people just let them fail their fundraising goals, the core service will likely continue to get the same budget, but they'll cut their pet projects and parties.