Re:Amazon shortchanged drivers $61.7M in tips
by ascorbic on Thursday February 04, 2021 @01:43AM
(#26023219)
So...they put the prices up by 20% or whatever. By definition, the amount they'd raise would be enough to pay the staff the equivalent to the amount lost in tips. They don't need to maintain the same GP margin, as this is pure extra revenue.
Re:Amazon shortchanged drivers $61.7M in tips
by 2muchcoffeeman on Thursday February 04, 2021 @05:50AM
(#26024331)
I don't understand your confusion. The amount of money the customer pays doesn't change.
I'll give an example:
$8 item + $4 (50%) tip = $12
$10 item + $2 (20%) tip = $12
$12 item + $0 (0%) tip = $12
In any scenario, the wait staff's pay comes from the customer. All we are doing is, setting the price, such that you no longer calculate the tip. If the actual price doesn't actually change, you can bake in whatever you want.
Re:Amazon shortchanged drivers $61.7M in tips
by jobigoud on Thursday February 04, 2021 @03:19AM
(#26023678)
Wait, if the employee gets their min wage covered by tips the employer pays less? That's even shadier than I thought. Is this in law? Wasn't a delivery company booed for that kind of behavior a while ago?
this is all the employer actually has to pay. Everything else is the customer. Now imagine the employer has to pay $15 an hour. Thats 6+ times what they pay now if its a decently busy place.
You still think it's going to be baked into the price?