News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by ngold on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @11:22PM (#26022540)
So we knows it's you, but you are a integer.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by WesolyKubeczek on Thursday February 04, 2021 @03:44AM (#26023800)
Reminds me of this:

"So here I was now, two years just to the day of being kicked and clanged into Staja 84F, dressed in the height of prison fashion, which was a one-piece suit of a very filthy like cal colour, and the number sewn on the groody part just above the old tick-tocker and on the back as well, so that going and coming I was 6655321 and not your little droog Alex not no longer."

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by ricardo81 on Thursday February 04, 2021 @04:19AM (#26023965)
Nothing like a little bit indirection to make it not true. It's blatantly obvious all the ways G can build a profile of someone by fingerprinting. Unfortunately it's not exactly an elevator pitch to make it a common knowledge thing.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by teddyh on Thursday February 04, 2021 @03:36AM (#26023769)
“I am not a number! I am a free man!”

— The Prisoner

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by chopin on Thursday February 04, 2021 @07:09AM (#26024676)
I don't think this would stand up to scrutiny if the EU was willing to really enforce the GDPR (unfortunately they are not).