Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by ngold on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @11:22PM
(#26022540)
So we knows it's you, but you are a integer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by WesolyKubeczek on Thursday February 04, 2021 @03:44AM
(#26023800)
Reminds me of this:
"So here I was now, two years just to the day of being kicked and clanged into Staja 84F, dressed in the height of prison fashion, which was a one-piece suit of a very filthy like cal colour, and the number sewn on the groody part just above the old tick-tocker and on the back as well, so that going and coming I was 6655321 and not your little droog Alex not no longer."
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by ricardo81 on Thursday February 04, 2021 @04:19AM
(#26023965)
Nothing like a little bit indirection to make it not true. It's blatantly obvious all the ways G can build a profile of someone by fingerprinting. Unfortunately it's not exactly an elevator pitch to make it a common knowledge thing.