Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by johnmaguire2013 on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @06:42PM
(#26020756)
You mention nearly limitless options but fail to mention one. Can you give some examples?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by ygjb on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @06:48PM
(#26020810)
at the very least, Google could pay to be the default search provider... it works for Mozilla, so far, and if Google had to , even at arms length, separate Chrome from the rest of Google, it would strengthen, not weaken, the case for Google's investment in paying Apple and Mozilla for top placement, helping to reinforce competition on both the mobile and browser fronts.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by throw_away on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @06:44PM
(#26020781)
default search seems to be pretty lucrative.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by dylan604 on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @09:02PM
(#26021711)
It's data collection is in Chrome's DNA. They could just continue to collect data on browser usage, and then "sell" that data to Google. No need for sites to install Analytics into their website when they can get 100% of all site analytics viewed from within their browser.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by ocdtrekkie on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @09:04PM
(#26021724)
A key difference here is that Chrome could sell aggregated analytics data for performance testing and such, but not allow the ad company to get user-targeting quality data. With them in the same company, this is a nearly impossible barrier to achieve.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti...
by joshuamorton on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @10:03PM
(#26022107)
I'll bite: why is this nearly impossible to achieve?
It may be nearly impossible to prove to you, but what makes it impossible, or even particularly difficult, to achieve if the company is interested in doing it?