Sputnik V vaccine peer reviewed with efficacy of 91.6%

Re:Sputnik V vaccine peer reviewed with efficacy of 91.6% by franklyt on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @02:48AM (#26011518)

Alrighty. You’re entitled to a contrary opinion. Not much to add beyond that.

All we can do is see how this shakes out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sputnik V vaccine peer reviewed with efficacy of 91.6% by Judgmentality on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @02:38PM (#26018138)

I was genuinely asking. What is "the good money" because I truly have no idea what you mean.

I also don't understand why the name is relevant. At least in the US, things with patriotic names - aka the Patriot Act - are almost always obvious propaganda attempts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sputnik V vaccine peer reviewed with efficacy of 91.6% by franklyt on Thursday February 04, 2021 @03:15AM (#26023647)

Can’t say I’m too much into internet arguments.

It was a turn of phrase. The good money is a good bet, i.e. I think a tenable and wise position would be to believe what I do, but understand if you do not and recognize my own propensity to be wrong.

As for the name, I felt immediately that it was significant because I knew Russia wouldn’t stake so much national pride on it if it was a dud. Indeed, the evidence coming in seems to suggest that it isn’t, so I feel doubly confident in that assessment.

That’s all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sputnik V vaccine peer reviewed with efficacy of 91.6% by Judgmentality on Thursday February 04, 2021 @04:37PM (#26030095)

Fair. I was antagonistic. Thank you for the reply.

[ Parent | on HN ]