Re:I'm tired of this anti-Wayland horseshit
by whatisthisfield on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @02:19PM
(#26005293)
> Not fantasy: GNOME on Wayland does not support server-side decorations.
So GNOME doesn't support your precious use-case, but it works perfectly fine for most users without server-side decorations.
This doesn't make GNOME a "dumpster fire" to anyone except the "Wayland sucks!" crowd. Or more of a dumpster fire than, say, Sway: I'm positive one can find a feature that Sway doesn't support.
Re:I'm tired of this anti-Wayland horseshit
by ddevault on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @02:58PM
(#26005774)
GNOME is a dumpster fire is a personal judgement based on a lot of different factors.
But yes, if GNOME or Sway is missing a feature then you want, then that's on them. It would speak ill of GNOME or Sway. But it usually does not speak ill of Wayland, which is the fallacy many, many, many people make, and then fill my inbox up with hateful shit over stuff that Sway actually supports!
Fantasy: Wayland does not support screen capture.
This criticism is not legitimate. In actual truth, many Wayland compositors do support screen capture.
Not fantasy: GNOME on Wayland does not support server-side decorations.
This is a legitimate criticism of GNOME.