Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS
by Teever on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:44AM
(#26001492)
From my understanding material like vellum could be scarce and and as such someone could have reused a piece of vellum simply out of necessity with no motive to deceive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS
by Nursie on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:06AM
(#26001745)
Sure, they could have - it was not cheap or easy to come by, but until there's a particular reason to think that happened in this case, it seems to be speculation.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS
by Teever on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:29AM
(#26002072)
Everything about the voynicn manuscript is speculation. That is what makes it so fascinating for people.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS
by Nursie on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @02:44PM
(#26005601)
While that's true "It was a hoax because <vanishingly unlikely thing>" kinda kills the fascination aspect for me. It's a bit of a downer.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS
by mumblemumble on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @12:30PM
(#26003841)
This is true, but scholars can tell if a manuscript is a palimpsest, and they seem to be agreed that Voynich is not one.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS
by matthewdgreen on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:44AM
(#26002298)
It seems like a whole lot of material, all of which came from the same time period. Would have been a lucky find to find essentially a whole book's worth of the stuff in one place.