News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by Nursie on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:30AM (#26001301)
This stretches Occams Razor somewhat. It could be, but it becomes less likely, as century-old stores of vellum would be required.

Particularly as back then, nobody would have been anticipating carbon dating.

Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by sandworm101 on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:38AM (#26001413)
Not carbon dating per se, but hoaxers would have an understanding of old v. new materials. Materials then were also not cheap. It would not have been unusual for someone to use an old bit of found blank parchment. They certainly would not have thrown it away unused.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by Teever on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:44AM (#26001492)
From my understanding material like vellum could be scarce and and as such someone could have reused a piece of vellum simply out of necessity with no motive to deceive.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by Nursie on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:06AM (#26001745)
Sure, they could have - it was not cheap or easy to come by, but until there's a particular reason to think that happened in this case, it seems to be speculation.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by Teever on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:29AM (#26002072)
Everything about the voynicn manuscript is speculation. That is what makes it so fascinating for people.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by Nursie on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @02:44PM (#26005601)
While that's true "It was a hoax because <vanishingly unlikely thing>" kinda kills the fascination aspect for me. It's a bit of a downer.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by mumblemumble on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @12:30PM (#26003841)
This is true, but scholars can tell if a manuscript is a palimpsest, and they seem to be agreed that Voynich is not one.
Re:The Radio-Carbon Dating of the Voynich MS by matthewdgreen on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:44AM (#26002298)
It seems like a whole lot of material, all of which came from the same time period. Would have been a lucky find to find essentially a whole book's worth of the stuff in one place.