Putrajaya in Malaysia (est 2001) is an interesting comparison. It's also overly ambitious and oversized, but it's not quite as nuts (the empty highways are 3-4 lanes, not 10), it has a comparatively far more sane location (between Kuala Lumpur and its main airport), and its actual population is around 90,000.
Re:Military seizes control in Myanmar
by clydethefrog on Monday February 01, 2021 @05:27AM
(#25987385)
And of course Astana - or now called Nur-Sultan to honour the Kazakh president. Also has the similar highways that can just be used for airplanes if needed. The city was a ghost town in the weekends when I visited 6 years ago, because all government personnel takes the night train to Almaty in the weekends.
Re:Military seizes control in Myanmar
by LargoLasskhyfv on Monday February 01, 2021 @01:54AM
(#25986302)
Dual use as runway for large planes.
Re:Military seizes control in Myanmar
by koheripbal on Monday February 01, 2021 @08:19AM
(#25988379)
Interestingly, Brasilia was modeled after the build-up of Washington DC - a remote capital that would not allow undue influence from any one existing US State.
In contrast to Brasilia (which is perhaps the most well-known recent-ish create-a-new-capital-from-scratch initiative), it is far less dense and less occupied. Contrasting to most of the other newer similarly-situated capitals, Naypyidaw is clearly pretty poorly populated and some of its infrastructure is laughably oversized compared to what use it would actually get (Why do you need that road with 10 lanes in each direction? It goes from nowhere to nowhere...).