Agri needs reform, but that does not mean that the proposed ones are what is needed.
As for the claim that the new laws allow anybody to approach a farmer with a better deal; sure that works in theory -- but notice that 1) that only works if there isn't a monopoly that drives prices (consider Jio that successfully monopolized telecom in India and now effectively sets prices throughout the industry) 2) farmers would be contractually obligated to sell produce (which would be a long-term deal).
The issue might be alleviated if the government promises to enforce a minimum price on all contracts made, but it will do nothing of that sort.
As for selling directly to end customers, in my limited knowledge, that is not a thing in India.
[1]: https://www.emis.com/php/company-profile/IN/Bharti_Airtel_Se...
[2]: https://assets.airtel.in/teams/simplycms/web/docs/Airtel-Int...
> Bharti Airtel Services Limited (BASL) engages mainly in selling of hardware for internet and satellite business.
Also please do elaborate on what sources of revenue that Airtel has that cause its 300M in loss while (as you claim) it makes profits in their telecom?
"Bharti Airtel Services Ltd. provides telecommunication services. The Company offers mobile, voice, and data services, as well as fixed line, high speed broadband, IPTV, and DTH services. Bharti provides telecom solutions for enterprises and international long distance service carriers."
> Also please do elaborate on what sources of revenue that Airtel has that cause its 300M in loss
Not interested. The bottom line is that Bharti Airtel Services, the direct competitor of Jio, is making a profit, contrary to your beliefs. Jio is not a monopoly.
I'm not sure if the Indian government does this, but in some countries the government breaks up monopolies and tries to prevent them from forming in the first place.
I think the new laws allow anyone to approach a farmer with a better deal, and if the farmer chooses, they can even try to sell directly to the end customers.