News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Reddit GME short squeeze game plan (143 days old) by mlthoughts2018 on Saturday January 30, 2021 @03:14PM (#25972536)
> “I'm still waiting for you to point out what exactly I've said that's wrong.”

I don’t know why you’re waiting on that. It’s absolutely not my job to go item by item through the comments and chronicle it for you, that’s on you if you care (or don’t, I don’t care, and I won’t be baited further). I just felt somebody needed to mention that they don’t take what you’re saying as accurate or trustworthy.

Re:The Reddit GME short squeeze game plan (143 days old) by nrmitchi on Saturday January 30, 2021 @03:25PM (#25972629)
If you are making a claim that everything someone is saying is wrong, you should will be willing to state what you think they are actually wrong about, and why.

No one is asking you to "go line by line", but right now you're just yelling "YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT" without even specifying what you're talking about.

Re:The Reddit GME short squeeze game plan (143 days old) by mlthoughts2018 on Saturday January 30, 2021 @03:44PM (#25972826)
No, one does not have to respond to “citation-needed” requests for bolstering arguments. Others are perfectly free to discredit me for that, ignore what I am saying, that is fine, but nobody is “required” and nobody “should” engage with that in every case.

In this particular case I think the arguments have been repeated many times across all the different GME threads. My goal is not to repeat them here, only to register dissent, which is a perfectly valid goal for me to have.