This definitely qualifies, because the stated intention is to move the price of the shares, not to acquire a position for any other reasonable purpose.
I work at a trading firm, if I outlined a plan to do anything like this I would (rightly) be fired instantly. If I actually did it I would go to jail.
The law shouldn't be applied differently for redditors, but probably it will be.
Regarding last week, what about the blocking of a number of symbols from being bought (but not sold) on retail platforms while the folks on the short side could unwind their positions? These were stocks with high short interest. How did Robinhood and IB and TD get the list, from analyzing Reddit in ML?
As to Robinhood, IB and TD, the Bloomberg reporting that DTCC (clearinghouse for trades) was demanding more collateral for the high volatility names and the retail brokers were facing a heard time coming up with it is pretty compelling. Unless someone can point to something other than innuendo, I’m probably gonna believe that.
The redditors have absolutely broken no laws, in fact there is not the slightest whiff of any reason to even suggest they might have. It’s just anger from wealth classes for having been embarrassed.
You're right. There was a concerted effort in the last week claiming that the hedge funds had closed their short positions. Turns out, a few had so GME went from 140% shorted way down to 130% shorted when historically, 25% is considered "high".
I hope someone looks into the hedge funds and the talking heads who spread this misinformation.
2. I didn't say any specific firm. I only know the aggregate numbers and the specifics on a couple and they're not one of them.
2) You intentionally used language that casts doubt on the only well-sourced statement, that Melvin got rid of their short position. If you're going to be so skeptical then I want to know why. If you think that CNBC is colluding with hedgefunds and intentionally publishing misinformation then I want to know why you are suggesting that.
https://financhill.com/most-heavily-shorted-stocks-today
250% of floating shares.
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/are-these-the-best-heavily-s...
121% short.
I'm an outsider to both the investing world and this whole WSB thing, but just from following the story I've gotten the opposite impression. The general sense I get from the WSB community is more like "GME is a garbage stock, you should buy it and some of these other worthless stocks too!" Might still be a crime, but it's not really misleading IMO.
It definitely looks like "market manipulation" but I think that's where the "public" aspect will play a part.
The defense will make the case of "why this group of little guys and not the hedge funds" against the SEC selectively prosecuting Redditors while giving hedge funds a pass.. in 2009-2010 under Obama and again under Biden.
I'll take the odds on WSB.