News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotify – Large Scale, Low Latency, P2P Music-on-Demand S... by xtacy on Sunday May 29, 2011 @12:42PM (#2596926)
I agree that if the end points are inside the ISP, it's good.

But peering is different from transit; peering is a delicate relationship where ISPs route traffic to each other for "free", as long as the demands are not too asymmetric. If this software results in a lot of traffic generated from a peering ISP, then it could be causes of worry for the receiving ISP.

Re:Spotify – Large Scale, Low Latency, P2P Music-on-Demand S... by sp332 on Sunday May 29, 2011 @12:47PM (#2596942)
But the "receiving" ISP is only receiving the data because its users asked for it. It doesn't make a difference if the data comes from a Spotify server or from a PC. It's still the same amount of data being transferred.
Re:Spotify – Large Scale, Low Latency, P2P Music-on-Demand S... by wmf on Sunday May 29, 2011 @02:56PM (#2597226)
Receiving data over a transit connection may be more expensive than from a CDN. In DOCSIS networks, P2P also tends to introduce last-mile upstream congestion which is expensive to fix.
Re:Spotify – Large Scale, Low Latency, P2P Music-on-Demand S... by themal on Sunday May 29, 2011 @09:25PM (#2598105)
The last mile problem is presumably exasperated by P2P users being mostly consumers, rather than businesses, and therefore paying next to nothing for the connections.