News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went priv... by epistasis on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @07:02PM (#25935994)
I don't think anybody has ever suffered negative regulatory action for doing a short squeeze. Even Martin Shkreli didn't get in trouble for his.
Re:Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went priv... by koolba on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @07:06PM (#25936049)
Acting alone it’s not inherently illegal. Real question is whether pooling your strength (ie assets) with others to force a squeeze is illegal collusion and market manipulation.
Re:Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went priv... by epistasis on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @07:29PM (#25936379)
In particular, it's hard to see a short squeeze as market manipulation, which is why nobody has been penalized for it.

What is a hedge fund except more explicit coordination of many people's money on a much greater scale? The classic example of Porsche's squeeze on VW stock was Porsche's management coordinating many people's pooled assets.

Re:Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went priv... by jfim on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @08:11PM (#25936777)
Re:Discord bans r/WallStreetBets server, subreddit went priv... by epistasis on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @08:34PM (#25936956)
It looks like Falcone may have been ok both sides of the squeeze, or at least treating its customers differently in order to execute it?