just as insecure as wpa and every other wifi "security" of the time.

That's what you get when all the decisions are made by a comitee that only cares about the BOM cost in the modems.

btw, nothing on this have changed. Only that the not-so-secure stuff is still relatively new and not exploited yet.

all hail wpa3, the new crapy unsafe standard of tomorrow.

Are the people downvoting still using WPA?

or betting their life on WPA3 that haven't had a decent sized deployment yet?

Or did they bet their lives on WPA2-PSK/WPA2-enterp during the first months of launch before any exploit was public?

:)