It set off the flamewar detector. We monitor that list and eventually cancel the penalty for threads that aren't actual flamewars, but it takes a while. If anyone wants to make it faster, emailing [email protected] is usually a forcing function.

Edit: Also, posts without URLs get a downweight by default. I've turned that off too, and merged the other threads into this one, since it was the first one.

> It set off the flamewar detector.

Why? There do not appear to have been any posts remotely resembling a flamewar in the comments.

That's answered in my sibling (well, cousin) comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25921757. It can't test for flamewars directly so it ends up guessing wrong sometimes.

How does one programmatically detect a flamewar? :)

By proxy, which is why there are false positives.

> How does one programmatically detect a flamewar? :)

An NLP/Machine learning model would be a great way! Probably also taking in other features as input such as the number of comments per second, and how deeply nested those comments are.

Let's build one!

I'm glad I'm not the only one noticing this. I could usually rely on HN to not be so heavily "filtered" for a lack of a better term but I have noticed the slide into a more controlled/gamed PR outlet.