News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 85 cracks down on supercookies by tsujp on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @11:55AM (#25918109)
You and everyone else who exhibit this are reading into things that don't exist. Language has context, words are part of language and so therefore words have context too.
Re:Firefox 85 cracks down on supercookies by pkulak on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @12:17PM (#25918456)
Exactly. And using white/black as synonyms for good/bad may be creating context (connotations, really) that we don't want. It would be fine if we hadn't already overloaded those words to refer to people... but, here we are. In the context we've created. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re:Firefox 85 cracks down on supercookies by cgriswald on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @12:52PM (#25918960)
The original poster used the terms used by the technology. The best choices for changing this terminology would be to write a treatise for HN consumption (to reach the community at large) or to contact the authors of the technology that use this terminology (to fix the origin in this case). Sniping a 'random internet poster' is just lazy trolling.
Re:Firefox 85 cracks down on supercookies by JKCalhoun on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @12:37PM (#25918773)
A black celebrity (forget who) said that he came to the realization growing up that the only positive connotation he could find for black was "in the black" with regards to finances.

So, I kind of see the point.

Re:Firefox 85 cracks down on supercookies by cgriswald on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @12:58PM (#25919033)
The downside of that is being 'in the red', which is also potentially problematic.

To fix the problem, we either have to stop referring to any metaphor/symbol involving color with negative connotations; or we have to stop using color to identify and refer to people. I think the former is good for precision (allowlist/denylist are great identifiers in that regard), but won't really solve our other problems; while the latter is probably better for human dignity, mutual respect, and combating our propensity for tribalism/racism. (Or, why not, we could do both.)