News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:First atomic clock wristwatch (2003) by Dylan16807 on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @06:41AM (#25914681)
> they won't be used to the handling a van this heavy, you will try to come to a stop and discover you're missing a car length

200 pounds of clock in a seat, and 300 pounds of battery with a removed seat. That's on par with simply having two people sit in the middle row.

Re:First atomic clock wristwatch (2003) by tvb on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @07:32AM (#25915088)
Yes, 500 pounds of gear sounds about right. I was aware that the car was slightly heavier than usual and drove accordingly. There was no hurry; it was not a race, just a leisurely weekend trip, about 2.5 hours in the car, with an average speed of maybe 35 mph.

With 3 expensive clocks, 3 priceless kids, not to mention hot coffee in hand, I accelerated and decelerated modestly. The drive from Bellevue to Paradise Lodge up on Mt Rainier is mostly rural and then follows a long slow winding mountain road to 5000 ft elevation.

Re:First atomic clock wristwatch (2003) by daniel957 on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @11:23AM (#25917630)
If there were 4 adults (and not 2 adults and 2 kids) with that amount of extra weight in the minivan, then you would see that they would be cutting it extremely close or be over for the maximum recommended amount of weight.

Besides, it’s not just the pounds that matter. Would you rather be hit by 200 pounds of hardness/sharpness/person bouncing to-and-fro or not be hit at all during a car crash cause that 200 pounds, whether object or person, was secured?