Re:Pip has dropped support for Python 2
by JasonFruit on Sunday January 24, 2021 @10:54AM
(#25892998)
Every language goes through this at some point in its development: flaws that limit future development have to be fixed. Should every language rename itself and split its community at that point? That seems like an extreme response to a common problem.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pip has dropped support for Python 2
by Chris2048 on Sunday January 24, 2021 @11:31AM
(#25893275)
> Should every language rename itself and split its community at that point?
yes. If breaking, fundamental changes are common, that's a problem.
Re:Pip has dropped support for Python 2
by JasonFruit on Sunday January 24, 2021 @05:15PM
(#25896721)
That people can make an initial plan that is self-consistent, logical, and foresees and provides for all future use-cases is a basic tenet of waterfall-style development. The history of software engineering does not uphold that principle. Why would it be different for language designers?