Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again
by irrational on Saturday January 23, 2021 @09:56PM
(#25888657)
Wait, what non-trivial site doesn’t require a database?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again
by giantDinosaur on Saturday January 23, 2021 @10:59PM
(#25889074)
All websites require a source for their data (i.e. a database), but many websites don't really need to be directly connected to a SQL database for nearly every page request or similar and can just use really simple files in S3 or something.
Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again
by monoideism on Saturday January 23, 2021 @10:02PM
(#25888684)
Many, many informational web sites do not require a database, including many non-trivial sites I've done for clients. Hugo is particularly adept for non-trivial static sites (via it's ability to use built-time API json data, etc).
Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again
by toast0 on Saturday January 23, 2021 @11:34PM
(#25889289)
Most corporate blogs with comments disabled would be fine as a filesystem, rather than a database.
Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again
by earthboundkid on Saturday January 23, 2021 @11:37PM
(#25889313)
JSON files in a git repo will get you really far if you want it to.