Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again

Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again by falcolas on Saturday January 23, 2021 @09:56PM (#25888655)

> I'm fairly certain for the White House's sort of use case this is not an issue.

One can only hope.

> We did not permit it to have write access to its own filesystem, at all. It worked fine.

Cool beans - you installed it sanely. But contrary to how WP expects to be installed. I've corrected the original statement.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again by hluska on Sunday January 24, 2021 @12:05AM (#25889459)

With all due respect, you have demonstrated a shocking lack of knowledge about Wordpress. It’s been a long time since I’ve read so many falsehoods spoken with such certainty. That’s not a good thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Whitehouse.gov Chooses WordPress, Again by kortilla on Saturday January 23, 2021 @11:48PM (#25889364)

> But contrary to how WP expects to be installed.

No, this is incorrect. WP is compatible with no write access and recognizes it in the default setup workflow.

[ Parent | on HN ]