Were they reacting to their voting rights being taken away, or reacting to having been led to believe that their voting rights were taken away? I have seen no credible evidence that they were disenfranchised.

Well, we can't investigate because the ballots have already been shredded and the voting machines have already been re-imaged. Despite there being laws on the books that cover one, if not both of those cases, making it illegal to do those things.

I guess that means nothing fishy was going on!

What investigative steps, taken by what body, would quell your concern about election fraud?

Except, their voting rights were not taken away. They voted for a candidate that received fewer votes than his opponent. They didn't like the results. They were fed deliberate lies and baseless theories, and acted upon bad intelligence.

That seems beside the point though. Nation-states could well coopt/dupe unwitting agents to do their deeds for them. Not necessarily saying that's what happened here, just making a point.

They were reacting to lies about their voting rights being taken away, no such thing occurred.

Storming the capitol because a bunch of con-men tricked you is not a better response than almost... anything?

Don't be so emotional, they were only taking your illusion of them.