Re:Remembering Windows 3.1 themes and user empowerment
by recursive on Saturday January 23, 2021 @12:02AM
(#25879819)
When Winamp first came out, everything was single core. Decoding mp3 took a significant bite out available CPU. Winamp was relatively efficient in CPU in RAM, especially compared to WMP.
Re:Remembering Windows 3.1 themes and user empowerment
by RedShift1 on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:12PM
(#25875782)
WMP plays anything the system has a codec for.
Re:Remembering Windows 3.1 themes and user empowerment
by hombre_fatal on Friday January 22, 2021 @08:58PM
(#25878795)
Making users care what codecs are and which are available on their system (and with no UI to even answer that question) is just another example of how bad some organizations are at UX.
That's how VLC became so popular. They realized "sorry, you don't have that codec" is only a bureaucrat's idea of good UX so they shipped every codec in software.
Re:Remembering Windows 3.1 themes and user empowerment
by TeMPOraL on Friday January 22, 2021 @04:54PM
(#25876763)
Ah, codecs. The biggest PITA on Windows in the 1990s/2000s. I went through two or three different videoplayers for the sole reason they shipped with whatever was needed to open just about any format out there. Meanwhile, trying to coerce WMP to open popular video formats was an exercise in futility...
(The blue/grey theme that came later was far less performant; I mean the original dark green/black theme.)
And WinAmp would open & play literally any format under the sun. WMP was limited to something like MP3 and WMA. (And maybe WAV.)