Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by IgorPartola on Thursday January 21, 2021 @08:00PM
(#25866912)
So Amazon forking ES is then ensuring that if Elastic dies, ElasticSearch doesn’t go away, right? Part of the problem here really is that if I am using AWS for the rest of my stack, why would I run my search elsewhere, introducing latency, etc? Elastic’s opportunity was to approach AWS and try to get bought. But their business model really isn’t as good as it seems.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by MoOmer on Thursday January 21, 2021 @08:27PM
(#25867074)
Elastic's Cloud offering runs in the major cloud providers [0].
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by IgorPartola on Thursday January 21, 2021 @08:46PM
(#25867209)
Is it better than AWS’s implementation?
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by patmorgan23 on Thursday January 21, 2021 @09:24PM
(#25867510)
And/or cost competitive.
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by theamk on Thursday January 21, 2021 @11:10PM
(#25868217)
Looking at a single machine (i3.large, 15GB ram, 470GB SD):
Raw EC2 costs: $0.156/hr or $112/month
AWS Elasticsearch: $0.25/hr or $180/month
Elastic's Elasticsearch: $0.3375/hr or $243/month (price stays about the same for 1, 2 or 3 nodes)
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by IgorPartola on Friday January 22, 2021 @07:25AM
(#25871078)
So if we assume the level of service is not much better, AWS is the more prudent choice, no? So trademark issues aside, AWS does ES better than Elastic?
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by budlightvirus on Friday January 22, 2021 @08:12AM
(#25871369)
To me that would depend on whether AWS Elasticsearch is actually profitable at that price point, or whether they are running at a loss to grab market share.
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by IgorPartola on Friday January 22, 2021 @08:37AM
(#25871516)
The quality of the service you get depends on if AWS makes a profit?
Also, do you think they make a profit on the bare EC2 instance? If so, why do you think that running a few management scripts that manage ES running on it would add up to more than $0.094/hour?