Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by IgorPartola on Friday January 22, 2021 @07:25AM
(#25871078)
So if we assume the level of service is not much better, AWS is the more prudent choice, no? So trademark issues aside, AWS does ES better than Elastic?
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by budlightvirus on Friday January 22, 2021 @08:12AM
(#25871369)
To me that would depend on whether AWS Elasticsearch is actually profitable at that price point, or whether they are running at a loss to grab market share.
Re:AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by IgorPartola on Friday January 22, 2021 @08:37AM
(#25871516)
The quality of the service you get depends on if AWS makes a profit?
Also, do you think they make a profit on the bare EC2 instance? If so, why do you think that running a few management scripts that manage ES running on it would add up to more than $0.094/hour?
Raw EC2 costs: $0.156/hr or $112/month
AWS Elasticsearch: $0.25/hr or $180/month
Elastic's Elasticsearch: $0.3375/hr or $243/month (price stays about the same for 1, 2 or 3 nodes)