Re:Judge refuses to reinstate Parler after Amazon shut it down
by evgen on Friday January 22, 2021 @05:40AM
(#25870421)
Actually, there is a lot of weak evidence out there that de-platforming actually worked as intended. It did push some users to more radical spaces, but it also made it very difficult for weakly-interested users to be pushed into the space and become further radicalized. When 'the algorithm' can no longer suggest a slightly more radical version of the content you are currently viewing because that version has been de-platformed then it seems we start to see the norm drift back towards center rather than being pushed further to an extreme.
Re:Judge refuses to reinstate Parler after Amazon shut it down
by ceejayoz on Friday January 22, 2021 @07:11AM
(#25870977)
I think you're agreeing with me?
Re:Judge refuses to reinstate Parler after Amazon shut it down
by evgen on Friday January 22, 2021 @07:26AM
(#25871081)
Yes, probably should have been a bit more clear about my point. It was not just Reddit and I think the evidence is a bit stronger than you hint at. The fundamental problem facing the 'free speech uber alles' crowd is that there is a growing body of evidence that shows how de-platforming works to limit and contain the most violent and toxic online actors.
You should re-read it. It offers that as a possibility, with terms like "may" and "could have". It does not conclude it did happen; it notes that some users migrated, but that's not at all surprising.
The hardcore folks are likely to always wind up somewhere, but driving them off Reddit likely makes it more difficult to recruit less initially strident users. As the study indicates, "the ban worked for Reddit".